Date and Time: Wednesday, June 17, 5:00 pm Pacific (June 18, 8.00am Singapore / Malaysia / Philippine )
Adults with intellectual disability are at risk for dysphagia. The unique swallowing, feeding, and behavioral challenges experienced in this population are vital considerations in the assessment and treatment of these patients. This webinar will discuss the nature of dysphagia management in adults with intellectual disability by exploring the current evidence in this area and discuss the clinical experiences of speech pathologists who assess and treat adults with intellectual disability in the Intermediate Care Setting.
At the completion of this webinar, participants will:
Understand the impacts of dysphagia in people with intellectual disability
Identify the systems that must be considered in the assessment and treatment of dysphagia in those with intellectual disability
Anticipate the physical-nutritional needs of those with intellectual disability as they age
Describe the interdisciplinary team collaborations required to manage dysphagia in this population
Life has been so busy since I came back from DRS 2017. Finally, I have some time to put up this blog.
I was honored to be invited to present a research poster at DRS this year.
This is probably one of the best year for dysphagia research representation from Singapore as we have 2 oral presentations from Singapore General Hospital and 1 poster presentation (presented by me) from National University of Singapore.
My poster presentation was on Swallow with Chin Tuck Against Resistance (S-CTAR).
Some of the happy moments at DRS:
Portland, Oregon is really beautiful and … cold.
Finally get a chance to meet my Facebook pal, Nabil from Canada in person. We share a common interest in dysphagia. Lots of interesting discussion on dysphagia via WhatsApp and Facebook messenger.
Get to meet some old friends and made more new friends from all around the world.
managed to take a selfie with Dr Reza Shaker!
Happy to know that CTAR or Chin Tuck Against Resistance is a well known and well like exercise in USA and Brazil. Brazil Speech Pathologists informed me that they have started research on CTAR! I really hope that clinical study on CTAR will be out soon.
Most Speech-Language Pathologists were excited to know that S-CTAR can be used as a task specific exercise and foresee that they will use it in their dysphagia therapy or management.
I was asked a few interesting questions on CTAR. One of the few interesting question is: are there any devices in the market that you think is good to be used to perform CTAR? I think this is an interesting question as we have seen quite a number of devices (different type of balls, hand held devices etc) being introduced to the market since the first paper on CTAR was published in 2014.
Click S-CTAR Poster to download the poster that I presented at DRS 2017.
I will list out all those questions and answers in separate post soon.
To end this post, I would like to congratulate and express my appreciation to all the DRS committees for this successful and enlightening meeting.
Evaluating the Training Effects of Two Swallowing Rehabilitation Therapies Using Surface Electromyography—Chin Tuck Against Resistance (CTAR) Exercise and the Shaker Exercise
Wei Ping Sze
, Wai Lam Yoon
, Nicolas Escoffier
, Susan J. Rickard Liow
In this study, the efficacy of two dysphagia interventions, the Chin Tuck against Resistance (CTAR) and Shaker exercises, were evaluated based on two principles in exercise science—muscle-specificity and training intensity. Both exercises were developed to strengthen the suprahyoid muscles, whose contractions facilitate the opening of the upper esophageal sphincter, thereby improving bolus transfer. Thirty-nine healthy adults performed two trials of both exercises in counter-balanced order. Surface electromyography (sEMG) recordings were simultaneously collected from suprahyoid muscle group and sternocleidomastoid muscle during the exercises. Converging results using sEMG amplitude analyses suggested that the CTAR was more specific in targeting the suprahyoid muscles than the Shaker exercise. Fatigue analyses on sEMG signals further indicated that the suprahyoid muscle group were equally or significantly fatigued (depending on metric), when participants carried out CTAR compared to the Shaker exercise. Importantly, unlike during Shaker exercise, the sternocleidomastoid muscles were significantly less activated and fatigued during CTAR. Lowering the chin against resistance is therefore sufficiently specific and intense to fatigue the suprahyoid muscles.
This poster was presented at the recent Dysphagia Research Society 23rd Annual Meeting at Illinois, Chicago, USA (12-14 March 2015).
Title: Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Fatigue Analysis Comparing Chin Tuck against Resistance (CTAR) Against the Shaker Exercise
Both Shaker and Chin Tuck against Resistance (CTAR) exercises were designed to improve swallowing through the strengthening of the suprahyoid muscles. However, a major limitation of the Shaker exercise was its early fatiguing of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM)(White et al., 2008). In this study, we investigated the extent CTAR recruits the suprahyoid and whether it fatigues SCM. Amplitude and fatigue analyses on sEMG data from 39 adults revealed that unlike Shaker exercise, CTAR was able to recruit the suprahyoid muscle, without substantially fatiguing SCM.
Shaker exercise increases UES opening by improving contraction of suprahyoid muscles (Shaker et al., 1997).
However, patient compliance was poor (50% attrition; e.g., Easterling et al., 2005).
Poor compliance of Shaker exercise was linked to muscle fatigue of auxiliary muscles, namely SCM (White et al., 2008). CTAR exercise was a response to this limitation.
Preliminary evidence for CTAR (N = 40 healthy adults; Yoon et al., 2014): (a) Greater sEMG values (amplitude) obtained from Suprahyoid during CTAR than during Shaker exercise. (b) Overall, participants reported CTAR as less strenuous.
Yoon et al’.s data was based on 10-sec isometric trials. The actual CTAR and Shaker exercises require 60 secs each. Will evidence on suprahyoid muscle strength still hold for CTAR when exercise duration is increased to 60 secs?
Main disadvantage for Shaker exercise was its fatiguing of auxiliary muscles beyond the suprahyoid, i.e., SCM. Is CTAR able to demonstrate that it does not suffer this same limitation (i.e., fatiguing of SCM)?
N = 39 healthy adults (20 males, 19 females; mean age = 29.82, SD = 5.09).
Each participant completed CTAR and Shaker twice in randomized counterbalanced order. 4-min rest in between each exercise.
Single-use pre-gelled electrode patches used (Figure 1; one placed on suprahyoid, the other on SCM).
sEMG collected by MyoTrac Infiniti encoder (2048 Hz).
CTAR Exercise (Figure 2):
Seated upright; shoulders not slouched.
Executed chin tuck, squeezing an inflatable rubber ball (12 cm diameter) between the base of chin and manubrium sterni for 60 secs.
Shaker Exercise (Figure 3):
Lie supine on an exercise mat.
Perform a head lift for 60 secs, shoulder not raised.
First and final 7 secs from each exercise interval discarded to eliminate noise. – MATLAB (Welsch Method) used to generate the power spectra density data.
2 x 2 ANOVA was conducted on each variable.
Suprahyoid registered sig. greater (ps < .001) values during CTAR than Shaker. SCM registered sig. greater (ps < .001) values during Shaker than CTAR.
Suprahyoid registered sig. greater (ps ≤ .02) fatigue during CTAR than Shaker. SCM registered sig. greater (ps ≤ .002) fatigue during Shaker than CTAR.
Rate of change in fatigue for Suprahyoid: CTAR = Shaker (ps > .10). Rate of change in fatigue for SCM: Sig. lesser (ps ≤ .01) during CTAR than Shaker
Converging data across two amplitude measures suggest that motor unit recruitment (thus muscle strength) for Suprahyoid was significantly greater during CTAR.
Converging data across four fatigue measures suggest that fatigue in SCM was significantly lesser during CTAR than the Shaker exercise.
Extends supporting evidence on CTAR’s usefulness in targeting Suprahyoid (SCM not as actively recruited), when conducted in its full 60-secs duration.
Clinical trials of CTAR on dysphagic patients recommended as follow-up.
In March 2013, Mr Jason Khoo (A MSc SLP graduate from NUS) presented this scientific poster on CTAR at the Dysphagia Research Society Meeting at Seattle, Washington, USA in 2013. Little did we expect that CTAR actually drew so much interest at the DRS meeting and was also awarded first place for the Scientific Abstract Poster.
Comparison of suprahyoid muscles activity between chin-tuck-against-resistance (CTAR) and the Shaker exercises
Jason KHOO, Susan J. RICKARD LIOW, YOON Wai Lam
For patients with pharyngeal dysphagia, therapeutic exercise such as the Shaker exercise to strengthen the suprahyoid muscles is effective in restoring oral feeding. However, observations revealed that the Shaker exercise is physically demanding for the elderly patients, thereby affecting compliance of the exercise goals. A less strenuous exercise, CTAR, was compared to the Shaker exercise by measuring the surface electromyography (sEMG) activity of the suprahyoid muscles during both exercises. The sEMG activity of the suprahyoid muscles during CTAR was similar or superior to the Shaker exercise. Therefore, CTAR exercise has the potential to achieve the same therapeutic effect as Shaker exercise and may improve compliance.
Aim: To find out if CTAR is as effective as Shaker exercise in exercising the suprahyoid muscles.
The Shaker exercise has been shown to be effective for patients with dysphagia due to incomplete upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening (Shaker et al, 2002).
Performing Shaker exercise significantly increased the anteroposterior diameter of the UES (Easterling et al, 2005) and significantly reduced post-swallow aspiration (Logemann et al, 2009).
A key component of Shaker exercise is in exercising the suprahyoid muscles, thereby strengthening it (Shaker et al, 2002).
Easterling et al (2005) found out that muscle discomfort or time constraints were main reasons for the failure of their participants in attaining the Shaker exercise goals.
Clinical observations suggest the Shaker exercise may pose a physical challenge for elderly dysphagic with chronic disease (Yoshida et al, 2007).
Developing a less strenuous therapeutic exercise would potentially benefit patients who find Shaker exercise physically challenging, thereby facilitating the attainment of the exercise goals.
The CTAR exercise, performed in a seated position, is less strenuous as the patient is not required to lift the weight of her head.
Performing the CTAR exercise in a seated position would make it more convenient for dysphagic patients who are actively mobile to comply with, thereby improving compliance.
The CTAR will adopt the same regime as Shaker exercise; a set of isometric (sustaining the effort) and isokinetic (repetitions) exercise with equal time base.
Research question: Would the sEMG activity of the suprahyoid muscles be higher during CTAR exercise?
N=40 healthy adults (21-40 yrs). Each participant performed a total of 4 exercise tasks, with a minimum 5 minute rest in between each task. The order of the 4 tasks are randomly assigned and counter-balanced across participants.
4 exercise tasks:
CTAR exercise (see Figure b):
Seated upright in chair
An inflatable rubber ball (diameter 12cm) is placed between chin and base of neck to provide resistance
Chin tuck against the ball and sustaining it for 10 sec (isometric)
Chin tuck against rubber ball for 10 repetitions (isokinetic)
Shaker exercise (see Figure c):
Lift head high enough to see their toes
Sustaining the head lift for 10 sec (isometric)
Lift head for 10 repetitions (isokinetic)
sEMG (see Figure a):
The activity of the suprahyoid muscles was measured using sEMG via an electrode patch attached to the participant’s suprahyoid area
The CTAR exercise appears to be similarly effective or superior to Shaker exercise in utilising the suprahyoid muscles.
If Shaker exercise is effective in strengthening the suprahyoid muscles and increasing the anteroposterior diameter of the UES, CTAR exercise may be able to achieve a similar or greater effect.
CTAR exercise may be a potential alternative for elderly dysphagic patients who find Shaker exercise physically challenging.
This study is limited to healthy young adults. Replication of this study on an older population will enable further understanding of the impact of age.
Future clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the therapeutic potential of CTAR in dysphagic patients with incomplete UES opening and the compliance of CTAR exercise amongst the elderly patients.
Chin Tuck Against Resistance (CTAR) is the top 10 most downloaded article from the Dysphagia Journal in 2014
I would like to take this opportunity to thank Speech-Language Pathologists / Therapists around the world for all the interest, support and word of encouragement for the Chin Tuck Against Resistance (CTAR) exercise and researches.
The National University of Singapore MSc SLP team will continue to try our best to come out with more quality researches.
The surprise news came from Mr Sze Wei Ping (A MSc graduate from National University of Singapore) 2 weeks ago when he went to present the follow up study on CTAR at the 23rd Dysphagia Research Meeting at Chicago, 2015. The first CTAR publication is actually the top 10 most downloaded article for the Dysphagia journal for year 2014.
Chin tuck against resistance (CTAR): new method for enhancing suprahyoid muscle activity using a Shaker-type exercise.Dysphagia. 2014 Apr;29(2):243-8. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9502-9. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
The interest on CTAR has started in Singapore long before it was announced to the world in 2013. In March 2013, Mr Jason Khoo (A MSc SLP graduate from NUS) presented the first scientific poster on CTAR at the Dysphagia Research Society Meeting at Seattle, Washington, USA in 2013. Little did we expect that CTAR actually drew so much interest at the DRS meeting and was also awarded first place for the Scientific Abstract Poster.
Some wrote in to enquire on how CTAR started?
Here is how it all begins….
The hunt for stretch ball was started in the year 2002 when I was still a junior SLP at Singapore General Hospital. I drew the inspiration from my geriatric patients who kept complaining that the Shaker’s exercise are too strenuous and they declined to perform it. After some thought, I came out with the idea of performing the chin tuck in a sitting position and conveniently use one of the stretch ball belongs to one of the patient and placed it under the patient’s chin as resistance. The geriatric patient was more willing to perform it and complaint of soreness felt at the chin area (Suprahyoid area) – that’s the sign of muscle fatigue! So I started to hunt for stretch balls on the very same night, bought at least 10 pieces. But I did not take into consideration the variation in neck length. The stretch ball was too small and hard for those with longer neck to hold it in between their chin and chest. A bigger ball was used (~10cm) and it seems to fit in nicely for most patients.
I actually prefer to use my palm to provide resistance. Why?
What about for patients who were just too weak to even initiate chin tuck with effort against the ball resistance? I noticed these patients were just resting their chin on the ball. I decided to use my palm to support the chin and found out that the effort for some of this patients were just so minimal as a result of their weakness. I did some search and found out from some dental journals indicated that the Suprahyoid muscles will only be activated when the chin is tucked down for at least 20 degrees, and the greater the degree, more suprahyoid muscle activities were noted. Also taking into consideration the principle of muscle strengthening, that for muscle to be strengthen, it has to be resisting about 60-80% of one repetition maximum. At least by using my palm I can estimate patient’s maximum effort and attempt to adjust my resistance accordingly to their effort (~60-80% of their max effort).
I have been performing CTAR for my patients for more than 10 years and I have seen good clinical outcomes in even severe dysphagia cases (i.e. lateral medullary syndrome).
Why I use a 12cm diameter ball in my study?
Making exercise easy and cost effective has always been my aim. The ball was chosen because it suits most neck length. Also, in research all subjects should be given the same type of resistance.
In the next coming blogs, I will be posting all the CTAR posters. Stay tuned!